An Opportunity for Empiricism
نویسندگان
چکیده
Howard Gardner, professor ofeducation and codirector ofProject Zero at Harvard University (Cambridge, Massachusetts), is recipient ofa MacArthur Prize Fellowship (1981-1986), the Grawemeyer Award in Education (1990), an American Psychological Association (APA) William James Award, and an APA National Psychology Awardfor Excellence in the Media . Gardner is author ofCreating Minds : An Anatomy of Creativity Seen Through the Lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi ; Leading Minds ; and Frames of Mind and coauthor, with D . H. Feldman and M. Csikszentmihalyi, of Changing the World : A Framework for the Study of Creativity . 0 David Lubinski, associate professor ofpsychology, director ofthe Psychometrics and Applied Individual Differences Division, and codirector of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) at Iowa State University (Ames), is coeditor, with R . V . Dawis, ofAssessing Individual Differences in Human Behavior : New Methods, Concepts, and Findings and coauthor, with R . V. Dawis, ofthe chapter "Aptitudes, Skills, and Proficiencies" in M. D . Dunnette and L . Hough (Eds .) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed .) . a Camilla P. Benbow, distinguished professor, chair ofpsychology, and codirector ofSMPY and ofthe Office of Precollegiate Programs for Talented and Gifted (OPPTAG) at Iowa State University, is a member ofthe Johns Hopkins Society of Scholars and coeditor, with J. C . Stanley, of Academic Precocity and, with D . Lubinski, of the forthcoming Intellectual Talent : Psychometric and Social Issues .
منابع مشابه
Two Dogmas of Neo-Empiricism
This article critically examines the contemporary resurgence of empiricism (or “neo-empiricism”) in philosophy, psychology, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence. This resurgence is an important and positive development. It is the first time that this centuries-old empiricist approach to cognition is precisely formulated in the context of cognitive science and neuroscience. Moreover, neo...
متن کاملAn Empirical Analysis of Perceptual Judgments
This paper is a defense of Reformed Empiricism, especially against those critics who take Reformed Empiricism to be a viable account of empirical rationality only if it avails itself of certain rationalist assumptions that are inconsistent with empiricism. I argue against three broad types of criticism that are found in the current literature, and propose a way of characterising Gupta’s constra...
متن کاملConstructive Empiricism And Modal Nominalism
James Ladyman has argued that constructive empiricism entails modal realism, and that this renders constructive empiricism untenable. We maintain that constructive empiricism is compatible with modal nominalism. Although the central term ‘observable’ has been analyzed in terms of counterfactuals, and in general counterfactuals do not have objective truth conditions, the property of being observ...
متن کاملStructural Realism or Modal Empiricism?
Structural realism has been suggested as the best compromise in the debate on scientific realism. It proposes that we should be realist about the relational structure of the world, not its nature. However it faces an important objection, first raised by Newman against Russell: if relations are not qualified, then the position is either trivial or collapses into empiricism, but if relations are ...
متن کاملEmpiricism, stances, and the problem of voluntarism
Empiricism can be very roughly characterized as the view that our knowledge about the world is based on sensory experience. Our knowledge about the world is "based" on sensory experience in the sense that we could not know what we know without relying on sense experience. This leaves open the possibility that sense experience is only necessary but not sufficient for the knowledge based upon it ...
متن کاملPragmatism, Inferentialism, and Modality in Sellars’s Arguments against Empiricism
In this essay I want to place the arguments of “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind” into a slightly less local context, by tracing further, into neighboring works, some strands of argumentation that intersect and are woven together in his critique of empiricism in its two principal then-extant forms: traditional, and 20 century logical empiricism. Sellars always accepted that observation rep...
متن کامل